§ The result
4 points separate Recruitee and HirePro.
Recruitee (ATS-integrated) edges HirePro (Screening) by 4 points under rubric v1.0, 42 to 38. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of Recruitee: Recruitee is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and HirePro on Bias Audit Transparency. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (HirePro 30, Recruitee 42) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 54% of the weighted advantage Recruitee holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HirePro
HirePro's AI Recruiter matches resumes to a job, shortlists candidates and runs AI-led interviews that score each answer with written reasoning and a fraud and identity check, alongside proctored assessments, video interviews and campus-hiring workflows.
Vendor profile
Recruitee
Collaborative applicant tracking system, part of the Tellent group, with AI-assisted features for job-description generation, screening candidates against team-defined criteria, resurfacing past applicants, and summarizing evaluation feedback.
§ The record
HirePro is filed under Screening AI, Recruitee under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only HirePro is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HirePro | Recruitee |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | IN | NL |
| Founded | 2004 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 48% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HirePro 30 · Recruitee 42
2.4 weighted points to Recruitee
12% weight · 60% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HirePro 35 · Recruitee 40
0.6 weighted points to Recruitee
18% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HirePro 33 · Recruitee 30
0.5 weighted points to HirePro
8% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HirePro 52 · Recruitee 58
0.5 weighted points to Recruitee
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HirePro 55 · Recruitee 58
0.4 weighted points to Recruitee
15% weight · 94% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HirePro 25 · Recruitee 27
0.3 weighted points to Recruitee
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HirePro 50 · Recruitee 52
0.3 weighted points to Recruitee
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -3.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -4 beside that -3.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HirePro minus Recruitee.
| Category | Weight | HirePro | Recruitee | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 42 | -12 | -2.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 33 | 30 | +3 | +0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 27 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 52 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 58 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 40 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 58 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 38 (F) | 42 (F) | -4 | -3.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HirePro | Recruitee | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 14 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HirePro has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Recruitee has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for HirePro, across 1 distinct source domain, and 21 for Recruitee, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HirePro last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Recruitee last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next