§ The result
Talkpush leads HirePro by 8 points.
Talkpush finishes 8 points ahead of HirePro under rubric v1.0, 46 to 38, both scored as Screening entries. Talkpush leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while HirePro leads 1, including Data Governance Disclosure. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (HirePro 30, Talkpush 52) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 52% of the weighted advantage Talkpush holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HirePro
HirePro's AI Recruiter matches resumes to a job, shortlists candidates and runs AI-led interviews that score each answer with written reasoning and a fraud and identity check, alongside proctored assessments, video interviews and campus-hiring workflows.
Vendor profile
Talkpush
Talkpush is a conversational recruitment CRM and applicant tracking system for high-volume hiring that screens candidates over WhatsApp, Messenger, SMS and voice using chatbots, automated workflows (Autoflow), an AI English-proficiency assessment (TalkScore) and an outbound AI voice agent.
§ The record
HirePro and Talkpush are both filed under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Assessment.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HirePro | Talkpush |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | IN | HK |
| Founded | 2004 | 2014 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 47% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HirePro 30 · Talkpush 52
4.4 weighted points to Talkpush
18% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HirePro 33 · Talkpush 42
1.6 weighted points to Talkpush
12% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HirePro 35 · Talkpush 46
1.3 weighted points to Talkpush
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HirePro 50 · Talkpush 44
0.9 weighted points to HirePro
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HirePro 52 · Talkpush 60
0.6 weighted points to Talkpush
15% weight · 99% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HirePro 25 · Talkpush 27
0.3 weighted points to Talkpush
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HirePro 55 · Talkpush 56
0.1 weighted points to Talkpush
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -7.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -8 beside that -7.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HirePro minus Talkpush.
| Category | Weight | HirePro | Talkpush | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 52 | -22 | -4.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 33 | 42 | -9 | -1.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 27 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 44 | +6 | +0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 56 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 46 | -11 | -1.3 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 60 | -8 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 38 (F) | 46 (F) | -8 | -7.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HirePro | Talkpush | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 21 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HirePro has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Talkpush has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Talkpush sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for HirePro, across 1 distinct source domain, and 28 for Talkpush, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HirePro last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Talkpush last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next