HomeCompareHireQuotient vs Humanly

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

HireQuotient vs Humanly

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Humanly leads HireQuotient on 5 of the 7 criteria.

Humanly scores 42 and HireQuotient 34 under rubric v1.0, an 8-point gap across the Screening and Sourcing cohorts. Humanly leads 5 of the 7 criteria and the remaining 2 are level, so HireQuotient is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 5 Humanly leads is Human Oversight Design, HireQuotient 57 to Humanly 58. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (HireQuotient 18, Humanly 40) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 48% of the weighted advantage Humanly holds across the 5 criteria it leads.

§ The record

HireQuotient is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Humanly under Screening AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Scheduling and Video interview.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHireQuotientHumanly
Price tierLowMid
HeadquartersSGUS
Founded20212018

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 48% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    HireQuotient 18 · Humanly 40

    4.0 weighted points to Humanly

  2. 20% weight · 73% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    HireQuotient 35 · Humanly 45

    2.0 weighted points to Humanly

  3. 15% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    HireQuotient 22 · Humanly 35

    1.9 weighted points to Humanly

  4. 8% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    HireQuotient 50 · Humanly 52

    0.2 weighted points to Humanly

  5. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    HireQuotient 57 · Humanly 58

    0.1 weighted points to Humanly

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -8.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -8 beside that -8.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is HireQuotient minus Humanly.

CategoryWeightHireQuotientHumanlyΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3545-10-2.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%1840-22-4.0
FRIA Support15%2235-13-1.9
Data Governance Disclosure15%4040--
Human Oversight Design12%5758-1-0.1
Post-Market Monitoring12%3030--
Customer Documentation8%5052-2-0.2
Total100%34 (F)42 (F)-8-8.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHireQuotientHumanly
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%245Sources on the vendor's own domain126Sources on the vendor's own domain

HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Humanly has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain, and 18 for Humanly, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
HireQuotient last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Humanly last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.