HomeCompareHireQuotient vs Indeed

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

HireQuotient vs Indeed

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Indeed leads HireQuotient on all 7 criteria.

The Sourcing cohort pairing of Indeed and HireQuotient comes out 50 to 34 under rubric v1.0, a 16-point lead for Indeed. Of the 7 criteria HireQuotient wins none, and the narrowest lead Indeed holds is on Human Oversight Design, HireQuotient 57 to Indeed 63. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (HireQuotient 35, Indeed 58, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 28% of the weighted advantage Indeed holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

HireQuotient and Indeed are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only HireQuotient is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHireQuotientIndeed
Price tierLowMid
HeadquartersSGUS
Founded20212004

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 28% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    HireQuotient 35 · Indeed 58

    4.6 weighted points to Indeed

  2. 18% weight · 50% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    HireQuotient 18 · Indeed 38

    3.6 weighted points to Indeed

  3. 15% weight · 67% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    HireQuotient 40 · Indeed 58

    2.7 weighted points to Indeed

  4. 15% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    HireQuotient 22 · Indeed 38

    2.4 weighted points to Indeed

  5. 12% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    HireQuotient 30 · Indeed 40

    1.2 weighted points to Indeed

  6. 8% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    HireQuotient 50 · Indeed 64

    1.1 weighted points to Indeed

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    HireQuotient 57 · Indeed 63

    0.7 weighted points to Indeed

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -16.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -16 beside that -16.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is HireQuotient minus Indeed.

CategoryWeightHireQuotientIndeedΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3558-23-4.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%1838-20-3.6
FRIA Support15%2238-16-2.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%4058-18-2.7
Human Oversight Design12%5763-6-0.7
Post-Market Monitoring12%3040-10-1.2
Customer Documentation8%5064-14-1.1
Total100%34 (F)50 (F)-16-16.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHireQuotientIndeed
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain42Sources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain70Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain70Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%245Sources on the vendor's own domain365Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Indeed has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 36 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Indeed sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 69 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain, and 40 for Indeed, across 5 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
HireQuotient last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Indeed last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.