HomeCompareHireQuotient vs Jobvite

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

HireQuotient vs Jobvite

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Jobvite leads HireQuotient by 11 points.

Jobvite, filed under ATS-integrated, comes out 11 points above HireQuotient, filed under Sourcing: 45 against 34 under rubric v1.0. Jobvite leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while HireQuotient leads 1, including Human Oversight Design. The advantage Jobvite holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (HireQuotient 18, Jobvite 38, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 31% of the weighted points Jobvite gains across the 6 criteria it leads.

§ The record

HireQuotient is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Jobvite under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only HireQuotient is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHireQuotientJobvite
Price tierLowEnterprise
HeadquartersSGUS
Founded20212006

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 30% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    HireQuotient 18 · Jobvite 38

    3.6 weighted points to Jobvite

  2. 20% weight · 56% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    HireQuotient 35 · Jobvite 50

    3.0 weighted points to Jobvite

  3. 15% weight · 74% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    HireQuotient 40 · Jobvite 55

    2.3 weighted points to Jobvite

  4. 15% weight · 85% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    HireQuotient 22 · Jobvite 30

    1.2 weighted points to Jobvite

  5. 12% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    HireQuotient 30 · Jobvite 38

    1.0 weighted points to Jobvite

  6. 8% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    HireQuotient 50 · Jobvite 58

    0.6 weighted points to Jobvite

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    HireQuotient 57 · Jobvite 55

    0.2 weighted points to HireQuotient

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -11.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -11 beside that -11.4.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is HireQuotient minus Jobvite.

CategoryWeightHireQuotientJobviteΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3550-15-3.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%1838-20-3.6
FRIA Support15%2230-8-1.2
Data Governance Disclosure15%4055-15-2.3
Human Oversight Design12%5755+2+0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3038-8-1.0
Customer Documentation8%5058-8-0.6
Total100%34 (F)45 (F)-11-11.4

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHireQuotientJobvite
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain12—
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain20—
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%245Sources on the vendor's own domain155Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Jobvite has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Jobvite sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain, and 19 for Jobvite, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
HireQuotient last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Jobvite last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.