§ The result
Jobylon leads HireQuotient on all 7 criteria.
Jobylon, filed under ATS-integrated, comes out 14 points above HireQuotient, filed under Sourcing: 48 against 34 under rubric v1.0. Jobylon takes all 7 criteria and HireQuotient none of them; the nearest contest is Human Oversight Design, HireQuotient 57 to Jobylon 60. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (HireQuotient 35, Jobylon 55, 20% weight), is only 29% of the weighted advantage Jobylon builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HireQuotient
EasySource by HireQuotient is an AI recruiting platform for North American frontline employers that sources and scores candidates from LinkedIn, the open web and partner databases, verifies licences, automates outreach including AI voice calls, and adds an ATS, interview scheduling, and skills, cognitive and AI-scored video assessments.
Vendor profile
Jobylon
Jobylon is a Stockholm-based applicant tracking system and talent CRM for enterprise employers whose optional AI features score each applicant's CV against the job description, suggest existing candidates for other open roles, draft job ads and screening questions, and run candidate screening and interview scheduling over WhatsApp, SMS and email.
§ The record
HireQuotient is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Jobylon under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Screening and Scheduling.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only HireQuotient is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HireQuotient | Jobylon |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | SG | SE |
| Founded | 2021 | 2011 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 29% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HireQuotient 35 · Jobylon 55
4.0 weighted points to Jobylon
15% weight · 49% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HireQuotient 40 · Jobylon 58
2.7 weighted points to Jobylon
15% weight · 65% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HireQuotient 22 · Jobylon 36
2.1 weighted points to Jobylon
18% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HireQuotient 18 · Jobylon 28
1.8 weighted points to Jobylon
12% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HireQuotient 30 · Jobylon 45
1.8 weighted points to Jobylon
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HireQuotient 50 · Jobylon 60
0.8 weighted points to Jobylon
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HireQuotient 57 · Jobylon 60
0.4 weighted points to Jobylon
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -13.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -14 beside that -13.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireQuotient minus Jobylon.
| Category | Weight | HireQuotient | Jobylon | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 55 | -20 | -4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 28 | -10 | -1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 36 | -14 | -2.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 58 | -18 | -2.7 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 57 | 60 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 45 | -15 | -1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 60 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 34 (F) | 48 (F) | -14 | -13.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireQuotient | Jobylon | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 28 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Jobylon has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 62 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain, and 33 for Jobylon, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireQuotient last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Jobylon last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next