HomeCompareHireQuotient vs Ribbon

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

HireQuotient vs Ribbon

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Ribbon leads HireQuotient by 9 points.

Under rubric v1.0, Ribbon, filed under Screening, finishes on 43 and HireQuotient, filed under Sourcing, on 34, 9 points apart. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of Ribbon: Ribbon is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and HireQuotient on Human Oversight Design. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (HireQuotient 18, Ribbon 38, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 37% of the weighted advantage Ribbon holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

HireQuotient is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Ribbon under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Video interview.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHireQuotientRibbon
Price tierLowLow
HeadquartersSGCA
Founded20212020

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 36% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    HireQuotient 18 · Ribbon 38

    3.6 weighted points to Ribbon

  2. 15% weight · 53% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    HireQuotient 22 · Ribbon 33

    1.6 weighted points to Ribbon

  3. 15% weight · 68% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    HireQuotient 40 · Ribbon 50

    1.5 weighted points to Ribbon

  4. 20% weight · 83% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    HireQuotient 35 · Ribbon 42

    1.4 weighted points to Ribbon

  5. 12% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    HireQuotient 30 · Ribbon 37

    0.8 weighted points to Ribbon

  6. 8% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    HireQuotient 50 · Ribbon 58

    0.6 weighted points to Ribbon

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    HireQuotient 57 · Ribbon 55

    0.2 weighted points to HireQuotient

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -9.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -9 beside that -9.4.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is HireQuotient minus Ribbon.

CategoryWeightHireQuotientRibbonΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3542-7-1.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%1838-20-3.6
FRIA Support15%2233-11-1.6
Data Governance Disclosure15%4050-10-1.5
Human Oversight Design12%5755+2+0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3037-7-0.8
Customer Documentation8%5058-8-0.6
Total100%34 (F)43 (F)-9-9.4

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHireQuotientRibbon
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%245Sources on the vendor's own domain314Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Ribbon has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Ribbon sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 64 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain, and 35 for Ribbon, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
HireQuotient last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Ribbon last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.