HomeCompareHireQuotient vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

HireQuotient vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads HireQuotient on all 7 criteria.

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting finishes 19 points clear of HireQuotient under rubric v1.0 — 53 against 34 — across the ATS-integrated and Sourcing cohorts. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; HireQuotient leads none. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (HireQuotient 35, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 37% of the weighted advantage SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

HireQuotient is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only HireQuotient is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHireQuotientSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Price tierLowEnterprise
HeadquartersSGDE
Founded20211972

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 37% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    HireQuotient 35 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70

    7.0 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  2. 18% weight · 59% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    HireQuotient 18 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    4.0 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  3. 15% weight · 75% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    HireQuotient 40 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 60

    3.0 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  4. 15% weight · 85% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    HireQuotient 22 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 35

    1.9 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  5. 12% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    HireQuotient 30 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    1.2 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  6. 8% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    HireQuotient 50 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    1.0 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    HireQuotient 57 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    0.6 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -18.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 18.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -19 beside that -18.7.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is HireQuotient minus SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting.

CategoryWeightHireQuotientSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3570-35-7.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%1840-22-4.0
FRIA Support15%2235-13-1.9
Data Governance Disclosure15%4060-20-3.0
Human Oversight Design12%5762-5-0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%3040-10-1.2
Customer Documentation8%5062-12-1.0
Total100%34 (F)53 (F)-19-18.7

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHireQuotientSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%245Sources on the vendor's own domain175Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 51 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain, and 22 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
HireQuotient last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.