HomeCompareHireQuotient vs SEEK

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

HireQuotient vs SEEK

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

SEEK leads HireQuotient on all 7 criteria.

SEEK finishes 20 points clear of HireQuotient under rubric v1.0 — 54 against 34 — across the Screening and Sourcing cohorts. SEEK leads every one of the 7 criteria and 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; HireQuotient leads none. The advantage SEEK holds is spread out: Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (HireQuotient 35, SEEK 70, 20% weight), yet it supplies only 36% of the weighted points SEEK gains across the 7 criteria it leads.

§ The record

HireQuotient is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, SEEK under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only HireQuotient is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHireQuotientSEEK
Price tierLowMid
HeadquartersSGAU
Founded20211997

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 36% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    HireQuotient 35 · SEEK 70

    7.0 weighted points to SEEK

  2. 18% weight · 56% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    HireQuotient 18 · SEEK 40

    4.0 weighted points to SEEK

  3. 15% weight · 71% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    HireQuotient 40 · SEEK 60

    3.0 weighted points to SEEK

  4. 12% weight · 84% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    HireQuotient 30 · SEEK 50

    2.4 weighted points to SEEK

  5. 15% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    HireQuotient 22 · SEEK 32

    1.5 weighted points to SEEK

  6. 8% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    HireQuotient 50 · SEEK 64

    1.1 weighted points to SEEK

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    HireQuotient 57 · SEEK 62

    0.6 weighted points to SEEK

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -19.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 19.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -20 beside that -19.6.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is HireQuotient minus SEEK.

CategoryWeightHireQuotientSEEKΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3570-35-7.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%1840-22-4.0
FRIA Support15%2232-10-1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%4060-20-3.0
Human Oversight Design12%5762-5-0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%3050-20-2.4
Customer Documentation8%5064-14-1.1
Total100%34 (F)54 (F)-20-19.6

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHireQuotientSEEK
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%245Sources on the vendor's own domain237Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; SEEK has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SEEK sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 59 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain, and 30 for SEEK, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
HireQuotient last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SEEK last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.