HomeCompareHireQuotient vs Stepstone

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

HireQuotient vs Stepstone

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Stepstone leads HireQuotient on all 7 criteria.

Under rubric v1.0, Stepstone (Screening) opens a 15-point lead on HireQuotient (Sourcing), 49 to 34. Stepstone leads every one of the 7 criteria, HireQuotient none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Human Oversight Design, HireQuotient 57 to Stepstone 58. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (HireQuotient 18, Stepstone 50, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 39% of the weighted advantage Stepstone holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

HireQuotient is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Stepstone under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only HireQuotient is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHireQuotientStepstone
Price tierLowMid
HeadquartersSGDE
Founded20211996

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 39% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    HireQuotient 18 · Stepstone 50

    5.8 weighted points to Stepstone

  2. 20% weight · 65% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    HireQuotient 35 · Stepstone 55

    4.0 weighted points to Stepstone

  3. 15% weight · 80% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    HireQuotient 40 · Stepstone 55

    2.3 weighted points to Stepstone

  4. 15% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    HireQuotient 22 · Stepstone 30

    1.2 weighted points to Stepstone

  5. 12% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    HireQuotient 30 · Stepstone 38

    1.0 weighted points to Stepstone

  6. 8% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    HireQuotient 50 · Stepstone 58

    0.6 weighted points to Stepstone

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    HireQuotient 57 · Stepstone 58

    0.1 weighted points to Stepstone

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -14.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 14.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -15 beside that -14.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is HireQuotient minus Stepstone.

CategoryWeightHireQuotientStepstoneΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3555-20-4.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%1850-32-5.8
FRIA Support15%2230-8-1.2
Data Governance Disclosure15%4055-15-2.3
Human Oversight Design12%5758-1-0.1
Post-Market Monitoring12%3038-8-1.0
Customer Documentation8%5058-8-0.6
Total100%34 (F)49 (F)-15-14.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHireQuotientStepstone
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%245Sources on the vendor's own domain294Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Stepstone has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Stepstone sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 62 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain, and 33 for Stepstone, across 6 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
HireQuotient last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Stepstone last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.