HomeCompareHireQuotient vs Tezi

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

HireQuotient vs Tezi

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Tezi leads HireQuotient on 6 of the 7 criteria.

Tezi finishes 24 points clear of HireQuotient under rubric v1.0 — 58 against 34 — across the Screening and Sourcing cohorts. Tezi leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so HireQuotient is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Tezi leads is Human Oversight Design, HireQuotient 57 to Tezi 63. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (HireQuotient 18, Tezi 83) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 49% of the weighted advantage Tezi holds across the 6 criteria it leads.

§ The record

HireQuotient is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Tezi under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Scheduling.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only HireQuotient is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHireQuotientTezi
Price tierLowMid
HeadquartersSGUS
Founded20212024

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 49% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    HireQuotient 18 · Tezi 83

    11.7 weighted points to Tezi

  2. 20% weight · 63% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    HireQuotient 35 · Tezi 52

    3.4 weighted points to Tezi

  3. 12% weight · 77% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    HireQuotient 30 · Tezi 58

    3.4 weighted points to Tezi

  4. 15% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    HireQuotient 22 · Tezi 38

    2.4 weighted points to Tezi

  5. 15% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    HireQuotient 40 · Tezi 55

    2.3 weighted points to Tezi

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    HireQuotient 57 · Tezi 63

    0.7 weighted points to Tezi

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -23.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 23.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -24 beside that -23.8.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is HireQuotient minus Tezi.

CategoryWeightHireQuotientTeziΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3552-17-3.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%1883-65-11.7
FRIA Support15%2238-16-2.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%4055-15-2.3
Human Oversight Design12%5763-6-0.7
Post-Market Monitoring12%3058-28-3.4
Customer Documentation8%5050--
Total100%34 (F)58 (F)-24-23.8

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHireQuotientTezi
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain20Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain20—
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%245Sources on the vendor's own domain113Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Tezi has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Tezi sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 43 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain, and 14 for Tezi, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
HireQuotient last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Tezi last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.