Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HiringBranch vs Workable
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
HiringBranch
HiringBranch is an AI skills-assessment platform that measures 50+ communication and soft skills from candidates' open-ended, conversational job-simulation responses (text and voice) to screen and rank applicants for customer-facing roles.
Vendor profile
Workable
Workable is an all-in-one applicant tracking system and HR platform whose AI feature layer (Workable AI / Workable Agent) sources, screens, scores, and matches candidates and drafts recruiting content within the recruiting workflow.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HiringBranch minus Workable.
| Category | Weight | HiringBranch | Workable | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 55 | +5 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 60 | 42 | +18 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 58 | -3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 62 | -10 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 42 | -2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 56 | +8 |
| Total | 100% | 52 (F) | 48 (F) | +4 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
HiringBranch
19 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 11
- absence
- 6
- audit report
- 1
- public statement
- 1
Evidence count
Workable
17 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 10
- public statement
- 1
- absence
- 6