HomeCompareHogan Assessments vs Pillar

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Hogan Assessments vs Pillar

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Hogan Assessments leads Pillar on all 7 criteria.

Hogan Assessments scores 47 and Pillar 40 under rubric v1.0, a 7-point gap across the Assessment and Screening cohorts. Hogan Assessments is ahead of Pillar on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being Human Oversight Design at Hogan Assessments 52 to Pillar 48. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Customer Documentation (Hogan Assessments 62, Pillar 50) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Hogan Assessments 50, Pillar 42), the second being 23% of the weighted advantage Hogan Assessments holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Hogan Assessments is filed under Assessment AI, Pillar under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHogan AssessmentsPillar
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded19872019

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 23% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Hogan Assessments 50 · Pillar 42

    1.6 weighted points to Hogan Assessments

  2. 18% weight · 39% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Hogan Assessments 44 · Pillar 38

    1.1 weighted points to Hogan Assessments

  3. 15% weight · 54% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Hogan Assessments 52 · Pillar 45

    1.1 weighted points to Hogan Assessments

  4. 8% weight · 68% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Hogan Assessments 62 · Pillar 50

    1.0 weighted points to Hogan Assessments

  5. 15% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Hogan Assessments 36 · Pillar 30

    0.9 weighted points to Hogan Assessments

  6. 12% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Hogan Assessments 40 · Pillar 33

    0.8 weighted points to Hogan Assessments

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Hogan Assessments 52 · Pillar 48

    0.5 weighted points to Hogan Assessments

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +6.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +7 beside that +6.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Hogan Assessments minus Pillar.

CategoryWeightHogan AssessmentsPillarΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5042+8+1.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%4438+6+1.1
FRIA Support15%3630+6+0.9
Data Governance Disclosure15%5245+7+1.1
Human Oversight Design12%5248+4+0.5
Post-Market Monitoring12%4033+7+0.8
Customer Documentation8%6250+12+1.0
Total100%47 (F)40 (F)+7+6.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHogan AssessmentsPillar
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11
Customer Documentation8%40Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%206Sources on the vendor's own domain127Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Hogan Assessments has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Pillar has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 26 for Hogan Assessments, across 1 distinct source domain, and 19 for Pillar, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Hogan Assessments last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Pillar last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.