HomeCompareHumanly vs JobDiva

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Humanly vs JobDiva

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Humanly leads JobDiva on 6 of the 7 criteria.

Humanly sits 13 points above JobDiva under rubric v1.0 — 42 against 29 — with Humanly filed under Screening and JobDiva under ATS-integrated. Humanly leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so JobDiva is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Humanly leads is Data Governance Disclosure, Humanly 40 to JobDiva 38. Even Bias Audit Transparency, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Humanly 40, JobDiva 15, 18% weight), is only 34% of the weighted advantage Humanly builds across the 6 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Humanly is filed under Screening AI, JobDiva under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Humanly is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHumanlyJobDiva
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20182003

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 34% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Humanly 40 · JobDiva 15

    4.5 weighted points to Humanly

  2. 20% weight · 60% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Humanly 45 · JobDiva 28

    3.4 weighted points to Humanly

  3. 12% weight · 77% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Humanly 58 · JobDiva 40

    2.2 weighted points to Humanly

  4. 15% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Humanly 35 · JobDiva 22

    1.9 weighted points to Humanly

  5. 8% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Humanly 52 · JobDiva 42

    0.8 weighted points to Humanly

  6. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Humanly 40 · JobDiva 38

    0.3 weighted points to Humanly

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +13.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +13 beside that +13.1.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Humanly minus JobDiva.

CategoryWeightHumanlyJobDivaΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4528+17+3.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%4015+25+4.5
FRIA Support15%3522+13+1.9
Data Governance Disclosure15%4038+2+0.3
Human Oversight Design12%5840+18+2.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3030--
Customer Documentation8%5242+10+0.8
Total100%42 (F)29 (F)+13+13.1

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHumanlyJobDiva
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Sources on the vendor's own domain12—
FRIA Support15%11—21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%126Sources on the vendor's own domain208Sources on the vendor's own domain

Humanly has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Humanly, across 3 distinct source domains, and 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Humanly last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
JobDiva last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.