Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Humanly vs Mercer | Mettl
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Vendor profile
Humanly
Conversational AI for high-volume recruiting that engages, screens, and schedules candidates across chat, SMS, email, voice, and video, with structured AI interviews and automated scoring.
Vendor profile
Mercer | Mettl
Mercer | Mettl is an online talent assessment and remote-proctoring platform offering psychometric, aptitude, coding, and skills tests plus AI-assisted exam proctoring and scoring for hiring, certification, and L&D.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Humanly minus Mercer | Mettl.
| Category | Weight | Humanly | Mercer | Mettl | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 45 | 38 | +7 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 42 | -2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 28 | +7 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 55 | -15 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 45 | +13 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 38 | -8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 52 | — |
| Total | 100% | 42 (F) | 42 (F) | — |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Humanly
18 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 9
- absence
- 6
- public statement
- 3
Evidence count
Mercer | Mettl
14 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 7
- absence
- 5
- public statement
- 2