Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Humanly vs Pinpoint
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Humanly
Conversational AI for high-volume recruiting that engages, screens, and schedules candidates across chat, SMS, email, voice, and video, with structured AI interviews and automated scoring.
Vendor profile
Pinpoint
Pinpoint is an applicant tracking system for in-house talent teams that layers AI-assisted screening onto core hiring workflows — candidate match scores, AI filters, anonymized screening, an interview notetaker, and a hiring copilot for outreach and rejections.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Humanly minus Pinpoint.
| Category | Weight | Humanly | Pinpoint | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 45 | 72 | -27 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 42 | -2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 38 | -3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 68 | -28 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 64 | -6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 52 | -22 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 66 | -14 |
| Total | 100% | 42 (F) | 57 (F) | -15 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Humanly
18 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 9
- absence
- 6
- public statement
- 3
Evidence count
Pinpoint
20 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 13
- public statement
- 5
- absence
- 2