§ The result
Pinpoint leads Humanly on all 7 criteria.
Pinpoint finishes 15 points clear of Humanly under rubric v1.0 — 57 against 42 — across the ATS-integrated and Screening cohorts. Pinpoint leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; Humanly leads none. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Data Governance Disclosure (Humanly 40, Pinpoint 68) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Humanly 45, Pinpoint 72), the second being 36% of the weighted advantage Pinpoint holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Humanly
Conversational AI for high-volume recruiting that engages, screens, and schedules candidates across chat, SMS, email, voice, and video, with structured AI interviews and automated scoring.
Vendor profile
Pinpoint
Pinpoint is an applicant tracking system for in-house talent teams that layers AI-assisted screening onto core hiring workflows - candidate match scores, AI filters, anonymized screening, an interview notetaker, and a hiring copilot for outreach and rejections.
§ The record
Humanly is filed under Screening AI, Pinpoint under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Humanly is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Humanly | Pinpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | JE |
| Founded | 2018 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 36% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Humanly 45 · Pinpoint 72
5.4 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 64% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Humanly 40 · Pinpoint 68
4.2 weighted points to Pinpoint
12% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Humanly 30 · Pinpoint 52
2.6 weighted points to Pinpoint
8% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Humanly 52 · Pinpoint 66
1.1 weighted points to Pinpoint
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Humanly 58 · Pinpoint 64
0.7 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 98% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Humanly 35 · Pinpoint 38
0.4 weighted points to Pinpoint
18% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Humanly 40 · Pinpoint 42
0.4 weighted points to Pinpoint
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -14.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 14.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -15 beside that -14.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Humanly minus Pinpoint.
| Category | Weight | Humanly | Pinpoint | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 45 | 72 | -27 | -5.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 42 | -2 | -0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 38 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 68 | -28 | -4.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 64 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 52 | -22 | -2.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 66 | -14 | -1.1 |
| Total | 100% | 42 (F) | 57 (F) | -15 | -14.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Humanly | Pinpoint | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 18 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Humanly has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Pinpoint has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 2 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 38 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Humanly, across 3 distinct source domains, and 20 for Pinpoint, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Humanly last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pinpoint last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next