Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Humanly vs Pymetrics (Harver Games)
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Vendor profile
Humanly
Conversational AI for high-volume recruiting that engages, screens, and schedules candidates across chat, SMS, email, voice, and video, with structured AI interviews and automated scoring.
42
FSubstantial gaps
Vendor profile
Pymetrics (Harver Games)
Behavioral assessment using browser-based "games" that infer cognitive and emotional traits. Acquired by Harver in 2022 and folded into the Harver Games product line.
56
FSubstantial gaps
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Humanly minus Pymetrics (Harver Games).
| Category | Weight | Humanly | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 45 | 70 | -25 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 80 | -40 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 60 | -20 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 50 | +8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 35 | -5 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 55 | -3 |
| Total | 100% | 42 (F) | 56 (F) | -14 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Humanly
18 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 9
- absence
- 6
- public statement
- 3
Evidence count
Pymetrics (Harver Games)
11 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 6
- audit report
- 2
- absence
- 2
- public statement
- 1