HomeCompareHumanly vs SHL

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Humanly vs SHL

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

SHL leads Humanly by 9 points.

SHL scores 51 and Humanly 42 under rubric v1.0, a 9-point gap across the Assessment and Screening cohorts. SHL leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Humanly leads 1, including FRIA Support, and 1 is level. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Data Governance Disclosure (Humanly 40, SHL 58) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Humanly 45, SHL 60), the second being 32% of the weighted advantage SHL holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Humanly is filed under Screening AI, SHL under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Video interview.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHumanlySHL
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSGB
Founded20181977

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 30% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Humanly 45 · SHL 60

    3.0 weighted points to SHL

  2. 15% weight · 56% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Humanly 40 · SHL 58

    2.7 weighted points to SHL

  3. 18% weight · 74% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Humanly 40 · SHL 50

    1.8 weighted points to SHL

  4. 12% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Humanly 30 · SHL 40

    1.2 weighted points to SHL

  5. 15% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Humanly 35 · SHL 30

    0.8 weighted points to Humanly

  6. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Humanly 52 · SHL 60

    0.6 weighted points to SHL

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -8.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -9 beside that -8.6.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Humanly minus SHL.

CategoryWeightHumanlySHLΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4560-15-3.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%4050-10-1.8
FRIA Support15%3530+5+0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%4058-18-2.7
Human Oversight Design12%5858--
Post-Market Monitoring12%3040-10-1.2
Customer Documentation8%5260-8-0.6
Total100%42 (F)51 (F)-9-8.6

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHumanlySHL
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%1111Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%126Sources on the vendor's own domain154Sources on the vendor's own domain

Humanly has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; SHL has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 37 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Humanly, across 3 distinct source domains, and 19 for SHL, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Humanly last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SHL last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.