Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Humanly vs Thomas International
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Vendor profile
Humanly
Conversational AI for high-volume recruiting that engages, screens, and schedules candidates across chat, SMS, email, voice, and video, with structured AI interviews and automated scoring.
Vendor profile
Thomas International
Thomas International provides psychometric and aptitude assessments (behaviour/DISC, cognitive ability, personality and emotional intelligence) with an AI coaching layer, used for hiring, candidate selection and employee development.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Humanly minus Thomas International.
| Category | Weight | Humanly | Thomas International | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 45 | 54 | -9 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 43 | -3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 33 | +2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 57 | -17 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 51 | +7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 40 | -10 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 60 | -8 |
| Total | 100% | 42 (F) | 48 (F) | -6 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Humanly
18 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 9
- absence
- 6
- public statement
- 3
Evidence count
Thomas International
17 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 11
- absence
- 6