§ The result
Workday Recruiting AI leads Humanly on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Workday Recruiting AI sits 14 points above Humanly under rubric v1.0 — 56 against 42 — with Workday Recruiting AI filed under ATS-integrated and Humanly under Screening. Workday Recruiting AI leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so Humanly is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Workday Recruiting AI leads is Post-Market Monitoring, Humanly 30 to Workday Recruiting AI 35. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Humanly 45, Workday Recruiting AI 70, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 38% of the weighted advantage Workday Recruiting AI holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Humanly
Conversational AI for high-volume recruiting that engages, screens, and schedules candidates across chat, SMS, email, voice, and video, with structured AI interviews and automated scoring.
Vendor profile
Workday Recruiting AI
AI features built into Workday Recruiting, including candidate-skill matching and recruiter productivity tools, surfaced inside the Workday ATS.
§ The record
Humanly is filed under Screening AI, Workday Recruiting AI under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Humanly is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Humanly | Workday Recruiting AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2018 | 2005 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Humanly 45 · Workday Recruiting AI 70
5.0 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
18% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Humanly 40 · Workday Recruiting AI 60
3.6 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Humanly 40 · Workday Recruiting AI 55
2.3 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
8% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Humanly 52 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
1.0 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Humanly 58 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
0.8 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Humanly 30 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
0.6 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -13.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -14 beside that -13.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Humanly minus Workday Recruiting AI.
| Category | Weight | Humanly | Workday Recruiting AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 45 | 70 | -25 | -5.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 60 | -20 | -3.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 35 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 55 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 65 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 65 | -13 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 42 (F) | 56 (F) | -14 | -13.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Humanly | Workday Recruiting AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Humanly has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Workday Recruiting AI has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 29 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Humanly, across 3 distinct source domains, and 11 for Workday Recruiting AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Humanly last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workday Recruiting AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next