HomeCompareInfor Talent Science vs Jobvite

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Infor Talent Science vs Jobvite

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

4 points separate Infor Talent Science and Jobvite.

Infor Talent Science (Assessment) edges Jobvite (ATS-integrated) by 4 points under rubric v1.0, 49 to 45. Jobvite takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Human Oversight Design among them, against 6 for Infor Talent Science, whose share includes Article 11 Technical Documentation. The advantage Infor Talent Science holds is spread out: Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Infor Talent Science 58, Jobvite 50, 20% weight), yet it supplies only 37% of the weighted points Infor Talent Science gains across the 6 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Infor Talent Science is filed under Assessment AI, Jobvite under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Infor Talent Science is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordInfor Talent ScienceJobvite
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20022006

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 32% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Infor Talent Science 58 · Jobvite 50

    1.6 weighted points to Infor Talent Science

  2. 12% weight · 49% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Infor Talent Science 45 · Jobvite 38

    0.8 weighted points to Infor Talent Science

  3. 15% weight · 64% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Infor Talent Science 35 · Jobvite 30

    0.8 weighted points to Infor Talent Science

  4. 18% weight · 79% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Infor Talent Science 42 · Jobvite 38

    0.7 weighted points to Infor Talent Science

  5. 12% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Infor Talent Science 50 · Jobvite 55

    0.6 weighted points to Jobvite

  6. 15% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Infor Talent Science 57 · Jobvite 55

    0.3 weighted points to Infor Talent Science

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Infor Talent Science 60 · Jobvite 58

    0.2 weighted points to Infor Talent Science

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +3.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +4 beside that +3.8.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Infor Talent Science minus Jobvite.

CategoryWeightInfor Talent ScienceJobviteΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5850+8+1.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%4238+4+0.7
FRIA Support15%3530+5+0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5755+2+0.3
Human Oversight Design12%5055-5-0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%4538+7+0.8
Customer Documentation8%6058+2+0.2
Total100%49 (F)45 (F)+4+3.8

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightInfor Talent ScienceJobvite
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain12—
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%51Sources on the vendor's own domain20—
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%277Sources on the vendor's own domain155Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Infor Talent Science has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Jobvite has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Jobvite sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 53 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Infor Talent Science, across 1 distinct source domain, and 19 for Jobvite, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Infor Talent Science last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Jobvite last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.