HomeCompareInfor Talent Science vs Pillar

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Infor Talent Science vs Pillar

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Infor Talent Science leads Pillar on all 7 criteria.

Under rubric v1.0, Infor Talent Science, filed under Assessment, finishes on 49 and Pillar, filed under Screening, on 40, 9 points apart. Infor Talent Science takes all 7 criteria from Pillar without a 20-point raw gap on any of them; the closest is Human Oversight Design, Infor Talent Science 50 to Pillar 48. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Infor Talent Science 58, Pillar 42, 20% weight), is only 36% of the weighted advantage Infor Talent Science builds across the 7 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Infor Talent Science is filed under Assessment AI, Pillar under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordInfor Talent SciencePillar
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20022019

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 36% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Infor Talent Science 58 · Pillar 42

    3.2 weighted points to Infor Talent Science

  2. 15% weight · 56% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Infor Talent Science 57 · Pillar 45

    1.8 weighted points to Infor Talent Science

  3. 12% weight · 72% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Infor Talent Science 45 · Pillar 33

    1.4 weighted points to Infor Talent Science

  4. 8% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Infor Talent Science 60 · Pillar 50

    0.8 weighted points to Infor Talent Science

  5. 15% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Infor Talent Science 35 · Pillar 30

    0.8 weighted points to Infor Talent Science

  6. 18% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Infor Talent Science 42 · Pillar 38

    0.7 weighted points to Infor Talent Science

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Infor Talent Science 50 · Pillar 48

    0.2 weighted points to Infor Talent Science

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +9.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +9 beside that +9.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Infor Talent Science minus Pillar.

CategoryWeightInfor Talent SciencePillarΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5842+16+3.2
Bias Audit Transparency18%4238+4+0.7
FRIA Support15%3530+5+0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5745+12+1.8
Human Oversight Design12%5048+2+0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%4533+12+1.4
Customer Documentation8%6050+10+0.8
Total100%49 (F)40 (F)+9+9.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightInfor Talent SciencePillar
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%51Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%277Sources on the vendor's own domain127Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Infor Talent Science has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Pillar has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 53 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Infor Talent Science, across 1 distinct source domain, and 19 for Pillar, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Infor Talent Science last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Pillar last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.