§ The result
Infor Talent Science leads Toggl Hire by 12 points.
Rubric v1.0 scores the Assessment entries Infor Talent Science and Toggl Hire at 49 and 37, a gap of 12 points. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of Infor Talent Science: Infor Talent Science is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and Toggl Hire on Human Oversight Design. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Infor Talent Science 58, Toggl Hire 30 — and at a 20% weight it carries 44% of the weighted advantage Infor Talent Science holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Infor Talent Science
Infor Talent Science is a cloud-based pre-hire behavioral and cognitive assessment platform. It scores candidates against patented machine-learning 'Performance Profiles' built from the behavior and performance data of an employer's successful incumbents, and gives hiring teams fit scores, recommendations and interview questions that are used to rank and route applicants.
Vendor profile
Toggl Hire
Toggl Hire is a skills-first hiring platform (now being retired) that screens candidates with auto-graded skills tests, async video interviews and homework assignments, bundled with a lightweight ATS.
§ The record
Infor Talent Science and Toggl Hire are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Infor Talent Science | Toggl Hire |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | US | EE |
| Founded | 2002 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 44% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Infor Talent Science 58 · Toggl Hire 30
5.6 weighted points to Infor Talent Science
18% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Infor Talent Science 42 · Toggl Hire 20
4.0 weighted points to Infor Talent Science
12% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Infor Talent Science 45 · Toggl Hire 35
1.2 weighted points to Infor Talent Science
8% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Infor Talent Science 60 · Toggl Hire 50
0.8 weighted points to Infor Talent Science
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Infor Talent Science 35 · Toggl Hire 30
0.8 weighted points to Infor Talent Science
15% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Infor Talent Science 57 · Toggl Hire 55
0.3 weighted points to Infor Talent Science
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Infor Talent Science 50 · Toggl Hire 52
0.2 weighted points to Toggl Hire
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +12.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +12 beside that +12.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Infor Talent Science minus Toggl Hire.
| Category | Weight | Infor Talent Science | Toggl Hire | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 58 | 30 | +28 | +5.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 42 | 20 | +22 | +4.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 30 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 55 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 52 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 45 | 35 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 50 | +10 | +0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 49 (F) | 37 (F) | +12 | +12.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Infor Talent Science | Toggl Hire | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 27 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 10 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Infor Talent Science has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Toggl Hire has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Infor Talent Science, across 1 distinct source domain, and 14 for Toggl Hire, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Infor Talent Science last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Toggl Hire last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next