§ The result
Infor Talent Science leads Turing on all 7 criteria.
Infor Talent Science sits 13 points above Turing under rubric v1.0, 49 against 36, with both filed under Assessment. Infor Talent Science is ahead of Turing on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being Human Oversight Design at Infor Talent Science 50 to Turing 45. Post-Market Monitoring is the widest raw gap (Infor Talent Science 45, Turing 27) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Infor Talent Science 58, Turing 42), 25% of the weighted advantage Infor Talent Science builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Infor Talent Science
Infor Talent Science is a cloud-based pre-hire behavioral and cognitive assessment platform. It scores candidates against patented machine-learning 'Performance Profiles' built from the behavior and performance data of an employer's successful incumbents, and gives hiring teams fit scores, recommendations and interview questions that are used to rank and route applicants.
Vendor profile
Turing
Turing is an AI-powered talent platform that vets software engineers through automated multi-stage technical assessments and uses machine-learned ranking to score, match, and place them with client companies.
§ The record
Infor Talent Science and Turing are both filed under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Infor Talent Science | Turing |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2002 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 25% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Infor Talent Science 58 · Turing 42
3.2 weighted points to Infor Talent Science
18% weight · 44% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Infor Talent Science 42 · Turing 28
2.5 weighted points to Infor Talent Science
12% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Infor Talent Science 45 · Turing 27
2.2 weighted points to Infor Talent Science
15% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Infor Talent Science 57 · Turing 44
1.9 weighted points to Infor Talent Science
15% weight · 88% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Infor Talent Science 35 · Turing 25
1.5 weighted points to Infor Talent Science
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Infor Talent Science 60 · Turing 48
1.0 weighted points to Infor Talent Science
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Infor Talent Science 50 · Turing 45
0.6 weighted points to Infor Talent Science
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +12.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +13 beside that +12.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Infor Talent Science minus Turing.
| Category | Weight | Infor Talent Science | Turing | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 58 | 42 | +16 | +3.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 42 | 28 | +14 | +2.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 44 | +13 | +1.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 45 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 45 | 27 | +18 | +2.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 48 | +12 | +1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 49 (F) | 36 (F) | +13 | +12.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Infor Talent Science | Turing | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 27 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 8 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Infor Talent Science has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Turing has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Infor Talent Science, across 1 distinct source domain, and 14 for Turing, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Infor Talent Science last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Turing last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next