§ The result
Interviewer.AI leads Recruiterflow by 11 points.
Interviewer.AI, filed under Video interview, comes out 11 points above Recruiterflow, filed under ATS-integrated: 47 against 36 under rubric v1.0. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of Interviewer.AI: Interviewer.AI is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and Recruiterflow on Post-Market Monitoring. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Interviewer.AI 52, Recruiterflow 33, 20% weight), is only 37% of the weighted advantage Interviewer.AI builds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Interviewer.AI
Interviewer.AI is an asynchronous AI video interview platform that pre-screens and scores candidates by analyzing recorded video responses and resumes against role-specific success factors, producing an "AI Score" breakdown to help recruiters shortlist.
Vendor profile
Recruiterflow
Recruiterflow is an ATS and CRM for recruiting agencies and executive search firms. Its AIRA AI layer ranks candidates already in a firm's database against each job with an explainable 0–100 Criteria Score (AIRA Matchmaker, shown as the 'AI Matches' card), and adds natural-language candidate search, external profile sourcing and an AI call notetaker that fills in interview scorecards.
§ The record
Interviewer.AI is filed under Video interview AI, Recruiterflow under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Interviewer.AI is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Interviewer.AI | Recruiterflow |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | SG | US |
| Founded | 2018 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 36% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Interviewer.AI 52 · Recruiterflow 33
3.8 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
18% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Interviewer.AI 35 · Recruiterflow 18
3.1 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
15% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Interviewer.AI 60 · Recruiterflow 44
2.4 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Interviewer.AI 35 · Recruiterflow 30
0.8 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Interviewer.AI 60 · Recruiterflow 58
0.2 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
8% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Interviewer.AI 58 · Recruiterflow 56
0.2 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Interviewer.AI 32 · Recruiterflow 33
0.1 weighted points to Recruiterflow
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +10.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +11 beside that +10.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Interviewer.AI minus Recruiterflow.
| Category | Weight | Interviewer.AI | Recruiterflow | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 33 | +19 | +3.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 18 | +17 | +3.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 30 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 44 | +16 | +2.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 58 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 32 | 33 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 56 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 47 (F) | 36 (F) | +11 | +10.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Interviewer.AI | Recruiterflow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 25 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Interviewer.AI has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Recruiterflow has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 49 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Interviewer.AI, across 1 distinct source domain, and 31 for Recruiterflow, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Interviewer.AI last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Recruiterflow last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.