HomeCompareisolved vs LinkedIn Recruiter

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

isolved vs LinkedIn Recruiter

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

LinkedIn Recruiter leads isolved on all 7 criteria.

LinkedIn Recruiter, filed under Sourcing, comes out 10 points above isolved, filed under ATS-integrated: 57 against 47 under rubric v1.0. LinkedIn Recruiter takes all 7 criteria from isolved without a 20-point raw gap on any of them; the closest is Post-Market Monitoring, isolved 47 to LinkedIn Recruiter 50. The advantage LinkedIn Recruiter holds is spread out: Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (isolved 50, LinkedIn Recruiter 67, 20% weight), yet it supplies only 36% of the weighted points LinkedIn Recruiter gains across the 7 criteria it leads.

§ The record

isolved is filed under ATS-integrated AI, LinkedIn Recruiter under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordisolvedLinkedIn Recruiter
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded19862002

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 36% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    isolved 50 · LinkedIn Recruiter 67

    3.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  2. 15% weight · 50% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    isolved 53 · LinkedIn Recruiter 62

    1.3 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  3. 12% weight · 64% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    isolved 55 · LinkedIn Recruiter 66

    1.3 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  4. 15% weight · 77% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    isolved 30 · LinkedIn Recruiter 38

    1.2 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  5. 8% weight · 87% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    isolved 56 · LinkedIn Recruiter 68

    1.0 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  6. 18% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    isolved 45 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50

    0.9 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    isolved 47 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50

    0.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -9.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -10 beside that -9.5.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is isolved minus LinkedIn Recruiter.

CategoryWeightisolvedLinkedIn RecruiterΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5067-17-3.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%4550-5-0.9
FRIA Support15%3038-8-1.2
Data Governance Disclosure15%5362-9-1.3
Human Oversight Design12%5566-11-1.3
Post-Market Monitoring12%4750-3-0.4
Customer Documentation8%5668-12-1.0
Total100%47 (F)57 (F)-10-9.5

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightisolvedLinkedIn Recruiter
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%41Audit reportSources on a separate domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%51Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%315Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain345Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

isolved has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; LinkedIn Recruiter has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for isolved and LinkedIn Recruiter sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 75 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 36 for isolved, across 4 distinct source domains, and 39 for LinkedIn Recruiter, across 6 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
isolved last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
LinkedIn Recruiter last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.