§ The result
PageUp leads isolved on all 7 criteria.
PageUp finishes 17 points clear of isolved inside the ATS-integrated cohort under rubric v1.0: 64 (D) against 47 (F). PageUp takes all 7 criteria and isolved none of them; the nearest contest is Customer Documentation, isolved 56 to PageUp 63. Even Bias Audit Transparency, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (isolved 45, PageUp 80, 18% weight), is only 38% of the weighted advantage PageUp builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
isolved
isolved is a US HCM and payroll provider whose isolved Talent Acquisition applicant tracking system (formerly ApplicantPro) uses AI Candidate Matching to score each applicant's resume against the job description and sort the applicant list, alongside AI job-ad writing and WedgeHR-powered one-way video interviews.
Vendor profile
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
§ The record
isolved and PageUp are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | isolved | PageUp |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | 1986 | 1997 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
isolved 45 · PageUp 80
6.3 weighted points to PageUp
20% weight · 66% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
isolved 50 · PageUp 74
4.8 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 75% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
isolved 30 · PageUp 40
1.5 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
isolved 53 · PageUp 63
1.5 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
isolved 55 · PageUp 64
1.1 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
isolved 47 · PageUp 55
1.0 weighted points to PageUp
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
isolved 56 · PageUp 63
0.6 weighted points to PageUp
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -16.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -17 beside that -16.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is isolved minus PageUp.
| Category | Weight | isolved | PageUp | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 74 | -24 | -4.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 45 | 80 | -35 | -6.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 40 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 53 | 63 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 64 | -9 | -1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 47 | 55 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 56 | 63 | -7 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 47 (F) | 64 (D) | -17 | -16.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | isolved | PageUp | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 31 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
isolved has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for isolved and PageUp sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 64 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 36 for isolved, across 4 distinct source domains, and 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- isolved last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next