HomeCompareJack & Jill vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Jack & Jill vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

4 points separate SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting and Jack & Jill.

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting (ATS-integrated) edges Jack & Jill (Sourcing) by 4 points under rubric v1.0, 53 to 49. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Jack & Jill leads 2, including Bias Audit Transparency. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Jack & Jill 44, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 58% of the weighted advantage SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting holds across the 5 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Jack & Jill is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordJack & JillSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersGBDE
Founded20251972

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 37% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Jack & Jill 44 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70

    5.2 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  2. 18% weight · 66% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Jack & Jill 62 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    4.0 weighted points to Jack & Jill

  3. 15% weight · 79% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Jack & Jill 48 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 60

    1.8 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  4. 15% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Jack & Jill 28 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 35

    1.1 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  5. 12% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Jack & Jill 48 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    1.0 weighted points to Jack & Jill

  6. 12% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Jack & Jill 58 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    0.5 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Jack & Jill 56 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    0.5 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -4.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -4 beside that -4.1.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Jack & Jill minus SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting.

CategoryWeightJack & JillSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4470-26-5.2
Bias Audit Transparency18%6240+22+4.0
FRIA Support15%2835-7-1.1
Data Governance Disclosure15%4860-12-1.8
Human Oversight Design12%5862-4-0.5
Post-Market Monitoring12%4840+8+1.0
Customer Documentation8%5662-6-0.5
Total100%49 (F)53 (F)-4-4.1

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightJack & JillSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%60Audit reportSources on a separate domain21Sources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Audit reportSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%71Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%80Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%315Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain175Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Jack & Jill has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Jack & Jill and SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 58 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 36 for Jack & Jill, across 2 distinct source domains, and 22 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Jack & Jill last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.