§ The result
JazzHR leads Moonhub on all 7 criteria.
JazzHR sits 14 points above Moonhub under rubric v1.0 — 44 against 30 — with JazzHR filed under ATS-integrated and Moonhub under Sourcing. JazzHR leads every one of the 7 criteria, Moonhub none of them, and the closest of the 7 is FRIA Support, JazzHR 28 to Moonhub 25. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Post-Market Monitoring (JazzHR 42, Moonhub 22) and Bias Audit Transparency at 18% (JazzHR 35, Moonhub 18), the second being 23% of the weighted advantage JazzHR holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
JazzHR
JazzHR is a small-business applicant tracking system that manages job posting, applications and hiring workflows, and layers on AI "Talent Fit" scoring that ranks candidates against a job description plus automated knockout screening questions.
Vendor profile
Moonhub
Moonhub is an AI recruiting platform whose agents (Qualify AI, Engage AI, Monitor AI) search, score, outreach to, and engage candidates across more than a billion public and proprietary profiles, working alongside human expert recruiters who vet candidates before presenting them.
§ The record
JazzHR is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Moonhub under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | JazzHR | Moonhub |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2009 | 2022 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 23% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JazzHR 35 · Moonhub 18
3.1 weighted points to JazzHR
20% weight · 45% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JazzHR 45 · Moonhub 30
3.0 weighted points to JazzHR
12% weight · 63% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JazzHR 42 · Moonhub 22
2.4 weighted points to JazzHR
15% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JazzHR 52 · Moonhub 40
1.8 weighted points to JazzHR
8% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JazzHR 56 · Moonhub 38
1.4 weighted points to JazzHR
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JazzHR 58 · Moonhub 48
1.2 weighted points to JazzHR
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JazzHR 28 · Moonhub 25
0.4 weighted points to JazzHR
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +13.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +14 beside that +13.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JazzHR minus Moonhub.
| Category | Weight | JazzHR | Moonhub | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 45 | 30 | +15 | +3.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 18 | +17 | +3.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 25 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 40 | +12 | +1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 48 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 22 | +20 | +2.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 56 | 38 | +18 | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 44 (F) | 30 (F) | +14 | +13.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JazzHR | Moonhub | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 17 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 6 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
JazzHR has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Moonhub has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for JazzHR sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 37 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 24 for JazzHR, across 2 distinct source domains, and 13 for Moonhub, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JazzHR last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Moonhub last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next