HomeCompareJobAdder vs Qureos

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

JobAdder vs Qureos

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

JobAdder leads Qureos on 6 of the 7 criteria.

JobAdder, filed under ATS-integrated, comes out 12 points above Qureos, filed under Screening: 45 against 33 under rubric v1.0. Qureos is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: JobAdder takes 6, the remaining criterion is level, and the nearest of those 6 is FRIA Support, JobAdder 30 to Qureos 25. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Bias Audit Transparency (JobAdder 35, Qureos 12) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (JobAdder 50, Qureos 28), the second being 35% of the weighted advantage JobAdder holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

JobAdder is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Qureos under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Qureos is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordJobAdderQureos
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersAUAE
Founded20072021

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 35% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    JobAdder 50 · Qureos 28

    4.4 weighted points to JobAdder

  2. 18% weight · 68% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    JobAdder 35 · Qureos 12

    4.1 weighted points to JobAdder

  3. 15% weight · 83% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    JobAdder 56 · Qureos 44

    1.8 weighted points to JobAdder

  4. 12% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    JobAdder 43 · Qureos 35

    1.0 weighted points to JobAdder

  5. 15% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    JobAdder 30 · Qureos 25

    0.8 weighted points to JobAdder

  6. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    JobAdder 58 · Qureos 52

    0.5 weighted points to JobAdder

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +12.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +12 beside that +12.5.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is JobAdder minus Qureos.

CategoryWeightJobAdderQureosΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5028+22+4.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%3512+23+4.1
FRIA Support15%3025+5+0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5644+12+1.8
Human Oversight Design12%5454--
Post-Market Monitoring12%4335+8+1.0
Customer Documentation8%5852+6+0.5
Total100%45 (F)33 (F)+12+12.5

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightJobAdderQureos
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%50Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%50Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%245Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain287Sources on the vendor's own domain

JobAdder has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Qureos has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for JobAdder sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 64 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for JobAdder, across 3 distinct source domains, and 35 for Qureos, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
JobAdder last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Qureos last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.