§ The result
Paycom leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Paycom opens a 21-point lead on JobDiva, 50 to 29, with both scored in the ATS-integrated cohort. JobDiva leads none of the 7 criteria, and Paycom is ahead on 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (JobDiva 28, Paycom 68, 20% weight), is only 38% of the weighted advantage Paycom builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
Paycom
Paycom is a single-database human capital management and payroll platform whose applicant tracking system automates recruiting with resume parsing, keyword/knockout candidate filtering, automated correspondence, generative job-description writing, and a command-driven AI data-query engine (IWant).
§ The record
JobDiva and Paycom are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Paycom is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | JobDiva | Paycom |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2003 | 1998 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · Paycom 68
8.0 weighted points to Paycom
18% weight · 57% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobDiva 15 · Paycom 38
4.1 weighted points to Paycom
15% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobDiva 38 · Paycom 62
3.6 weighted points to Paycom
12% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · Paycom 55
1.8 weighted points to Paycom
8% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · Paycom 60
1.4 weighted points to Paycom
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · Paycom 30
1.2 weighted points to Paycom
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · Paycom 38
1.0 weighted points to Paycom
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -21.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 21.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -21 beside that -21.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus Paycom.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | Paycom | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 68 | -40 | -8.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 38 | -23 | -4.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 30 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 62 | -24 | -3.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 55 | -15 | -1.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 38 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 60 | -18 | -1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 50 (F) | -21 | -21.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | Paycom | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 13 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Paycom has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 20 for Paycom, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Paycom last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next