§ The result
Recruitee leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Both filed under ATS-integrated, Recruitee and JobDiva come out 42 and 29 under rubric v1.0, 13 points in favour of Recruitee. Recruitee is ahead of JobDiva on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being FRIA Support at JobDiva 22 to Recruitee 27. Human Oversight Design is the widest raw gap (JobDiva 40, Recruitee 58) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (JobDiva 28, Recruitee 42), 22% of the weighted advantage Recruitee builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
Recruitee
Collaborative applicant tracking system, part of the Tellent group, with AI-assisted features for job-description generation, screening candidates against team-defined criteria, resurfacing past applicants, and summarizing evaluation feedback.
§ The record
JobDiva and Recruitee are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Recruitee is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | JobDiva | Recruitee |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | NL |
| Founded | 2003 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 22% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · Recruitee 42
2.8 weighted points to Recruitee
18% weight · 42% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobDiva 15 · Recruitee 30
2.7 weighted points to Recruitee
12% weight · 59% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · Recruitee 58
2.2 weighted points to Recruitee
15% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobDiva 38 · Recruitee 52
2.1 weighted points to Recruitee
8% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · Recruitee 58
1.3 weighted points to Recruitee
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · Recruitee 40
1.2 weighted points to Recruitee
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · Recruitee 27
0.8 weighted points to Recruitee
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -13.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -13 beside that -13.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus Recruitee.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | Recruitee | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 42 | -14 | -2.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 30 | -15 | -2.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 27 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 52 | -14 | -2.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 58 | -18 | -2.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 40 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 58 | -16 | -1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 42 (F) | -13 | -13.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | Recruitee | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 14 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Recruitee has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 49 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 21 for Recruitee, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Recruitee last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next