§ The result
Recruitly leads JobDiva on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Recruitly sits 12 points above JobDiva under rubric v1.0, 41 against 29, with both filed under ATS-integrated. JobDiva is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: Recruitly takes 6, the remaining criterion is level, and the nearest of those 6 is Data Governance Disclosure, JobDiva 38 to Recruitly 45. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Human Oversight Design (JobDiva 40, Recruitly 60) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (JobDiva 28, Recruitly 45), the second being 29% of the weighted advantage Recruitly holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
Recruitly
Recruitly is an all-in-one ATS and CRM for recruitment agencies. It includes AI candidate matching, which ranks candidates against live jobs and shows its reasons, and AI application review, which scores and explains each applicant against the job spec. It also offers external profile sourcing, CV parsing, an AI phone system and an AI meeting assistant.
§ The record
JobDiva and Recruitly are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Recruitly is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | JobDiva | Recruitly |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | US | AE |
| Founded | 2003 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 29% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · Recruitly 45
3.4 weighted points to Recruitly
12% weight · 49% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · Recruitly 60
2.4 weighted points to Recruitly
15% weight · 65% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · Recruitly 35
1.9 weighted points to Recruitly
12% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · Recruitly 45
1.8 weighted points to Recruitly
8% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · Recruitly 58
1.3 weighted points to Recruitly
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobDiva 38 · Recruitly 45
1.1 weighted points to Recruitly
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -11.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -12 beside that -11.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus Recruitly.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | Recruitly | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 45 | -17 | -3.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 15 | - | - |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 35 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 45 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 60 | -20 | -2.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 45 | -15 | -1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 58 | -16 | -1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 41 (F) | -12 | -11.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | Recruitly | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 32 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Recruitly has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 32 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 65 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 37 for Recruitly, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Recruitly last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next