§ The result
Sense leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 29 points between Sense (Screening) and JobDiva (ATS-integrated): 58 for Sense, 29 for JobDiva. Sense leads every one of the 7 criteria and 6 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; JobDiva leads none. The advantage Sense holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (JobDiva 15, Sense 72, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 35% of the weighted points Sense gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
Sense
Sense is a conversational AI talent engagement platform that screens, scores, matches, and schedules candidates for high-volume recruiting via chatbot, SMS/WhatsApp, and voice AI on top of a customer's ATS.
§ The record
JobDiva is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Sense under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Sense is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | JobDiva | Sense |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2003 | 2016 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 35% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobDiva 15 · Sense 72
10.3 weighted points to Sense
20% weight · 57% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · Sense 60
6.4 weighted points to Sense
15% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobDiva 38 · Sense 58
3.0 weighted points to Sense
12% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · Sense 64
2.9 weighted points to Sense
12% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · Sense 52
2.6 weighted points to Sense
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · Sense 38
2.4 weighted points to Sense
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · Sense 62
1.6 weighted points to Sense
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -29.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 29.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -29 beside that -29.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus Sense.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | Sense | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 60 | -32 | -6.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 72 | -57 | -10.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 38 | -16 | -2.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 58 | -20 | -3.0 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 64 | -24 | -2.9 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 52 | -22 | -2.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 62 | -20 | -1.6 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 58 (F) | -29 | -29.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | Sense | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 16 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Sense has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Sense sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 19 for Sense, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Sense last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next