§ The result
Tezi leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 29 points between Tezi (Screening) and JobDiva (ATS-integrated): 58 for Tezi, 29 for JobDiva. Tezi leads every one of the 7 criteria and 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; JobDiva leads none. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (JobDiva 15, Tezi 83) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 43% of the weighted advantage Tezi holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
Tezi
Tezi's product "Max" is an autonomous AI recruiting agent that sources passive candidates, screens and ranks inbound applications via conversational chat, and schedules interviews, integrating with ATS and calendar tools.
§ The record
JobDiva is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Tezi under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Tezi is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | JobDiva | Tezi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2003 | 2024 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 43% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobDiva 15 · Tezi 83
12.2 weighted points to Tezi
20% weight · 59% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · Tezi 52
4.8 weighted points to Tezi
12% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · Tezi 58
3.4 weighted points to Tezi
12% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · Tezi 63
2.8 weighted points to Tezi
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobDiva 38 · Tezi 55
2.5 weighted points to Tezi
15% weight · 98% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · Tezi 38
2.4 weighted points to Tezi
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · Tezi 50
0.6 weighted points to Tezi
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -28.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 28.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -29 beside that -28.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus Tezi.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | Tezi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 52 | -24 | -4.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 83 | -68 | -12.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 38 | -16 | -2.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 55 | -17 | -2.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 63 | -23 | -2.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 58 | -28 | -3.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 50 | -8 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 58 (F) | -29 | -28.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | Tezi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 11 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Tezi has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Tezi sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Tezi, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Tezi last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next