§ The result
UKG leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
The ATS-integrated cohort pairing of UKG and JobDiva comes out 44 to 29 under rubric v1.0, a 15-point lead for UKG. UKG leads every one of the 7 criteria, JobDiva none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Post-Market Monitoring, JobDiva 30 to UKG 38. The advantage UKG holds is spread out: Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (JobDiva 28, UKG 48, 20% weight), yet it supplies only 27% of the weighted points UKG gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
UKG
UKG is an enterprise HCM and workforce-management suite whose UKG Pro Recruiting applicant-tracking module, augmented by the embedded Bryte AI layer, drafts job descriptions and produces profile-match candidate scores to rank and shortlist applicants.
§ The record
JobDiva and UKG are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only UKG is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | JobDiva | UKG |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2003 | 2020 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 27% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · UKG 48
4.0 weighted points to UKG
18% weight · 45% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobDiva 15 · UKG 30
2.7 weighted points to UKG
15% weight · 64% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobDiva 38 · UKG 56
2.7 weighted points to UKG
15% weight · 77% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · UKG 35
1.9 weighted points to UKG
12% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · UKG 52
1.4 weighted points to UKG
8% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · UKG 55
1.0 weighted points to UKG
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · UKG 38
1.0 weighted points to UKG
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -14.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 14.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -15 beside that -14.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus UKG.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | UKG | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 48 | -20 | -4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 30 | -15 | -2.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 35 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 56 | -18 | -2.7 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 52 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 38 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 55 | -13 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 44 (F) | -15 | -14.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | UKG | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 0 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 2 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; UKG has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 8 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for UKG, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- UKG last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next