HomeCompareJobylon vs Maki People

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Jobylon vs Maki People

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Maki People leads Jobylon on all 7 criteria.

Maki People finishes 19 points clear of Jobylon under rubric v1.0 — 67 (D) against 48 (F) — across the Assessment and ATS-integrated cohorts. Of the 7 criteria Jobylon wins none, and the narrowest lead Maki People holds is on Data Governance Disclosure, Jobylon 58 to Maki People 64. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Jobylon 28, Maki People 80) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 49% of the weighted advantage Maki People holds across the 7 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Jobylon is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Maki People under Assessment AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Screening and Scheduling.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Maki People is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordJobylonMaki People
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersSEFR
Founded20112021

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 49% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Jobylon 28 · Maki People 80

    9.4 weighted points to Maki People

  2. 15% weight · 70% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Jobylon 36 · Maki People 62

    3.9 weighted points to Maki People

  3. 20% weight · 79% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Jobylon 55 · Maki People 64

    1.8 weighted points to Maki People

  4. 12% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Jobylon 45 · Maki People 55

    1.2 weighted points to Maki People

  5. 8% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Jobylon 60 · Maki People 74

    1.1 weighted points to Maki People

  6. 15% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Jobylon 58 · Maki People 64

    0.9 weighted points to Maki People

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Jobylon 60 · Maki People 66

    0.7 weighted points to Maki People

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -19.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 19.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -19 beside that -19.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Jobylon minus Maki People.

CategoryWeightJobylonMaki PeopleΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5564-9-1.8
Bias Audit Transparency18%2880-52-9.4
FRIA Support15%3662-26-3.9
Data Governance Disclosure15%5864-6-0.9
Human Oversight Design12%6066-6-0.7
Post-Market Monitoring12%4555-10-1.2
Customer Documentation8%6074-14-1.1
Total100%48 (F)67 (D)-19-19.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightJobylonMaki People
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain40Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%50Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%50Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%285Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain256Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Jobylon has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Maki People has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Maki People sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 64 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for Jobylon, across 1 distinct source domain, and 31 for Maki People, across 5 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Jobylon last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Maki People last reviewed
September 8, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.