§ The result
Jobylon leads Mercor on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 25 points between Jobylon (ATS-integrated) and Mercor (Screening): 48 for Jobylon, 23 for Mercor. Jobylon leads every one of the 7 criteria and 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; Mercor leads none. Data Governance Disclosure is the widest raw gap (Jobylon 58, Mercor 22) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Jobylon 55, Mercor 22), 27% of the weighted advantage Jobylon builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Jobylon
Jobylon is a Stockholm-based applicant tracking system and talent CRM for enterprise employers whose optional AI features score each applicant's CV against the job description, suggest existing candidates for other open roles, draft job ads and screening questions, and run candidate screening and interview scheduling over WhatsApp, SMS and email.
Vendor profile
Mercor
Mercor is an AI talent platform that runs automated 20-minute AI video interviews and semantic resume/profile matching to vet, score, and place candidates and expert contractors, and offers an enterprise applicant-screening product that scores employers' applicant pools against role rubrics with pass/fail recommendations.
§ The record
Jobylon is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Mercor under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Mercor is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Jobylon | Mercor |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | SE | US |
| Founded | 2011 | 2023 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 27% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Jobylon 55 · Mercor 22
6.6 weighted points to Jobylon
15% weight · 49% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Jobylon 58 · Mercor 22
5.4 weighted points to Jobylon
18% weight · 62% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Jobylon 28 · Mercor 10
3.2 weighted points to Jobylon
12% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Jobylon 45 · Mercor 20
3.0 weighted points to Jobylon
15% weight · 85% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Jobylon 36 · Mercor 20
2.4 weighted points to Jobylon
12% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Jobylon 60 · Mercor 42
2.2 weighted points to Jobylon
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Jobylon 60 · Mercor 40
1.6 weighted points to Jobylon
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +24.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 24.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +25 beside that +24.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Jobylon minus Mercor.
| Category | Weight | Jobylon | Mercor | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 22 | +33 | +6.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 28 | 10 | +18 | +3.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 36 | 20 | +16 | +2.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 22 | +36 | +5.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 42 | +18 | +2.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 45 | 20 | +25 | +3.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 40 | +20 | +1.6 |
| Total | 100% | 48 (F) | 23 (F) | +25 | +24.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Jobylon | Mercor | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 28 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 10 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Jobylon has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Mercor has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 8 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 49 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for Jobylon, across 1 distinct source domain, and 16 for Mercor, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Jobylon last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Mercor last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next