§ The result
Pinpoint leads Jobylon on all 7 criteria.
Pinpoint finishes 9 points ahead of Jobylon under rubric v1.0, 57 to 48, both scored as ATS-integrated entries. Pinpoint takes all 7 criteria from Jobylon without a 20-point raw gap on any of them; the closest is FRIA Support, Jobylon 36 to Pinpoint 38. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Jobylon 55, Pinpoint 72, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 36% of the weighted advantage Pinpoint holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Jobylon
Jobylon is a Stockholm-based applicant tracking system and talent CRM for enterprise employers whose optional AI features score each applicant's CV against the job description, suggest existing candidates for other open roles, draft job ads and screening questions, and run candidate screening and interview scheduling over WhatsApp, SMS and email.
Vendor profile
Pinpoint
Pinpoint is an applicant tracking system for in-house talent teams that layers AI-assisted screening onto core hiring workflows - candidate match scores, AI filters, anonymized screening, an interview notetaker, and a hiring copilot for outreach and rejections.
§ The record
Jobylon and Pinpoint are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Screening and Sourcing.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Jobylon | Pinpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | SE | JE |
| Founded | 2011 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 36% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Jobylon 55 · Pinpoint 72
3.4 weighted points to Pinpoint
18% weight · 62% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Jobylon 28 · Pinpoint 42
2.5 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Jobylon 58 · Pinpoint 68
1.5 weighted points to Pinpoint
12% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Jobylon 45 · Pinpoint 52
0.8 weighted points to Pinpoint
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Jobylon 60 · Pinpoint 64
0.5 weighted points to Pinpoint
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Jobylon 60 · Pinpoint 66
0.5 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Jobylon 36 · Pinpoint 38
0.3 weighted points to Pinpoint
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -9.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -9 beside that -9.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Jobylon minus Pinpoint.
| Category | Weight | Jobylon | Pinpoint | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 72 | -17 | -3.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 28 | 42 | -14 | -2.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 36 | 38 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 68 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 64 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 45 | 52 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 66 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 48 (F) | 57 (F) | -9 | -9.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Jobylon | Pinpoint | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 28 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 18 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Jobylon has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Pinpoint has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 2 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 53 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for Jobylon, across 1 distinct source domain, and 20 for Pinpoint, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Jobylon last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pinpoint last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next