HomeCompareJobylon vs Tribepad

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Jobylon vs Tribepad

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Tribepad takes the total, Jobylon takes more of the criteria.

Tribepad finishes 8 points ahead of Jobylon under rubric v1.0, 56 to 48, both scored as ATS-integrated entries. Jobylon leads more of the criteria, 4 against 3 for Tribepad, yet Tribepad takes Bias Audit Transparency, which carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum with it. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Jobylon 28, Tribepad 78 — and at an 18% weight it carries 88% of the weighted advantage Tribepad holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Jobylon and Tribepad are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordJobylonTribepad
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersSEGB
Founded20112008

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 76% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Jobylon 28 · Tribepad 78

    9.0 weighted points to Tribepad

  2. 12% weight · 85% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Jobylon 45 · Tribepad 54

    1.1 weighted points to Tribepad

  3. 15% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Jobylon 36 · Tribepad 30

    0.9 weighted points to Jobylon

  4. 15% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Jobylon 58 · Tribepad 56

    0.3 weighted points to Jobylon

  5. 12% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Jobylon 60 · Tribepad 58

    0.2 weighted points to Jobylon

  6. 20% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Jobylon 55 · Tribepad 56

    0.2 weighted points to Tribepad

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Jobylon 60 · Tribepad 58

    0.2 weighted points to Jobylon

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -8.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -8 beside that -8.7.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Jobylon minus Tribepad.

CategoryWeightJobylonTribepadΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5556-1-0.2
Bias Audit Transparency18%2878-50-9.0
FRIA Support15%3630+6+0.9
Data Governance Disclosure15%5856+2+0.3
Human Oversight Design12%6058+2+0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%4554-9-1.1
Customer Documentation8%6058+2+0.2
Total100%48 (F)56 (F)-8-8.7

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightJobylonTribepad
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain40Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%50Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%50Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%285Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain284Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Jobylon has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Tribepad has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Tribepad sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 65 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for Jobylon, across 1 distinct source domain, and 32 for Tribepad, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Jobylon last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Tribepad last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.