HomeCompareJuicebox (PeopleGPT) vs SeekOut

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Juicebox (PeopleGPT) vs SeekOut

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Juicebox (PeopleGPT) leads SeekOut on all 7 criteria.

Juicebox (PeopleGPT) finishes 23 points clear of SeekOut inside the Sourcing cohort under rubric v1.0: 57 against 34. Juicebox (PeopleGPT) leads every one of the 7 criteria and 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; SeekOut leads none. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 84, SeekOut 40, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 36% of the weighted advantage Juicebox (PeopleGPT) holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Juicebox (PeopleGPT) and SeekOut are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Juicebox (PeopleGPT) is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.

RecordJuicebox (PeopleGPT)SeekOut
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20222017

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 36% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 84 · SeekOut 40

    7.9 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)

  2. 12% weight · 52% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 55 · SeekOut 25

    3.6 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)

  3. 20% weight · 67% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 52 · SeekOut 35

    3.4 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)

  4. 15% weight · 82% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 56 · SeekOut 35

    3.1 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)

  5. 8% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 60 · SeekOut 35

    2.0 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)

  6. 15% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 35 · SeekOut 25

    1.5 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 50 · SeekOut 45

    0.6 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +22.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 22.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +23 beside that +22.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Juicebox (PeopleGPT) minus SeekOut.

CategoryWeightJuicebox (PeopleGPT)SeekOutΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5235+17+3.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%8440+44+7.9
FRIA Support15%3525+10+1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%5635+21+3.1
Human Oversight Design12%5045+5+0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%5525+30+3.6
Customer Documentation8%6035+25+2.0
Total100%57 (F)34 (F)+23+22.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightJuicebox (PeopleGPT)SeekOut
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%30Audit reportSources on a separate domain11
FRIA Support15%11Sources on a separate domain01
Data Governance Disclosure15%20Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%11Sources on a separate domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%20Audit reportSources on a separate domain01
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%124Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain54Sources on the vendor's own domain

Juicebox (PeopleGPT) has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; SeekOut has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 5 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Juicebox (PeopleGPT) sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 25 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Juicebox (PeopleGPT), across 4 distinct source domains, and 9 for SeekOut, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SeekOut last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.