HomeCompareKeka vs Zoho Recruit

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Keka vs Zoho Recruit

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Zoho Recruit leads Keka on 4 of the 7 criteria.

Inside the ATS-integrated cohort, rubric v1.0 puts Zoho Recruit on 42 and Keka on 37, 5 points apart. Zoho Recruit leads 4 of the 7 criteria and the remaining 3 are level, so Keka is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 4 Zoho Recruit leads is Bias Audit Transparency, Keka 20 to Zoho Recruit 24. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Keka 30, Zoho Recruit 45) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 62% of the weighted advantage Zoho Recruit holds across the 4 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Keka and Zoho Recruit are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Zoho Recruit is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordKekaZoho Recruit
Price tierLowLow
HeadquartersININ
Founded20141996

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 62% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Keka 30 · Zoho Recruit 45

    3.0 weighted points to Zoho Recruit

  2. 15% weight · 77% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Keka 50 · Zoho Recruit 55

    0.8 weighted points to Zoho Recruit

  3. 18% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Keka 20 · Zoho Recruit 24

    0.7 weighted points to Zoho Recruit

  4. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Keka 55 · Zoho Recruit 60

    0.4 weighted points to Zoho Recruit

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 4 figures above sum to -4.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -5 beside that -4.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Keka minus Zoho Recruit.

CategoryWeightKekaZoho RecruitΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3045-15-3.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2024-4-0.7
FRIA Support15%3030--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5055-5-0.8
Human Oversight Design12%5050--
Post-Market Monitoring12%4040--
Customer Documentation8%5560-5-0.4
Total100%37 (F)42 (F)-5-4.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightKekaZoho Recruit
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%51Sources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%71Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%287Sources on the vendor's own domain107Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Keka has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Zoho Recruit has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 52 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 35 for Keka, across 1 distinct source domain, and 17 for Zoho Recruit, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Keka last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Zoho Recruit last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.