HomeCompareKorn Ferry vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Korn Ferry vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads Korn Ferry by 7 points.

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting scores 53 and Korn Ferry 46 under rubric v1.0, a 7-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Korn Ferry leads 1, including Bias Audit Transparency. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Korn Ferry 58, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 30% of the weighted advantage SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Korn Ferry is filed under Assessment AI, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Korn Ferry is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordKorn FerrySAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSDE
Founded19691972

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 26% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Korn Ferry 58 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70

    2.4 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  2. 15% weight · 42% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Korn Ferry 25 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 35

    1.5 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  3. 18% weight · 57% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Korn Ferry 48 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    1.4 weighted points to Korn Ferry

  4. 15% weight · 70% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Korn Ferry 52 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 60

    1.2 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  5. 12% weight · 83% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Korn Ferry 52 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    1.2 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  6. 12% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Korn Ferry 33 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    0.8 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Korn Ferry 52 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    0.8 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -6.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -7 beside that -6.5.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Korn Ferry minus SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting.

CategoryWeightKorn FerrySAP SuccessFactors RecruitingΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5870-12-2.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%4840+8+1.4
FRIA Support15%2535-10-1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%5260-8-1.2
Human Oversight Design12%5262-10-1.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3340-7-0.8
Customer Documentation8%5262-10-0.8
Total100%46 (F)53 (F)-7-6.5

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightKorn FerrySAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%0111Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%107Sources on the vendor's own domain175Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Korn Ferry has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 39 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Korn Ferry, across 1 distinct source domain, and 22 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Korn Ferry last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.