§ The result
LoopCV leads LazyApply by 13 points.
LoopCV sits 13 points above LazyApply under rubric js-v1.0, 50 against 37, with both filed under Auto-apply. LoopCV leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Application Honesty, while LazyApply leads 1, including Data & Credential Safety, and 1 is level. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: User Control & Transparency (LazyApply 33, LoopCV 60) and Application Honesty at 20% (LazyApply 32, LoopCV 55), the second being 31% of the weighted advantage LoopCV holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
LazyApply
LazyApply is a Chrome extension that automatically mass-applies to jobs on LinkedIn, Indeed, ZipRecruiter, Dice and Greenhouse by auto-filling application forms from a saved profile, and tracks the submitted applications in an analytics dashboard.
Vendor profile
LoopCV
LoopCV is a job-search automation platform that continuously matches a job seeker's CV to postings across 30+ job boards and applies on their behalf via ATS form-fills, LinkedIn Easy Apply, and templated emails to recruiters.
§ The record
LazyApply and LoopCV are both filed under Auto-apply tools. They also share 1 secondary category: Tracker.
| Record | LazyApply | LoopCV |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Low |
| Headquarters | IN | GR |
| Founded | 2020 | 2019 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 27% of the movement so far
Application Honesty
LazyApply 32 · LoopCV 55
4.6 weighted points to LoopCV
15% weight · 51% of the movement so far
User Control & Transparency
LazyApply 33 · LoopCV 60
4.0 weighted points to LoopCV
10% weight · 64% of the movement so far
Pricing & Cancellation Fairness
LazyApply 42 · LoopCV 65
2.3 weighted points to LoopCV
8% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Support & Accountability
LazyApply 42 · LoopCV 68
2.1 weighted points to LoopCV
20% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Data & Credential Safety
LazyApply 50 · LoopCV 40
2.0 weighted points to LazyApply
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Employer & ATS Legitimacy
LazyApply 25 · LoopCV 38
1.9 weighted points to LoopCV
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -13.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -13 beside that -13.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is LazyApply minus LoopCV.
| Category | Weight | LazyApply | LoopCV | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Honesty | 20% | 32 | 55 | -23 | -4.6 |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 50 | 40 | +10 | +2.0 |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 33 | 60 | -27 | -4.0 |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 25 | 38 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 35 | 35 | - | - |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 42 | 65 | -23 | -2.3 |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 42 | 68 | -26 | -2.1 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 50 (F) | -13 | -13.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | LazyApply | LoopCV | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Application Honesty | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | — |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 0 | — |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 14 | 3 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 12 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
LazyApply has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; LoopCV has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LazyApply and LoopCV sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 31 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for LazyApply, across 4 distinct source domains, and 14 for LoopCV, across 6 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- js-v1.0
- LazyApply last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- LoopCV last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next
Scored against