§ The result
Massive leads LazyApply by 13 points.
Massive sits 13 points above LazyApply under rubric js-v1.0, 50 against 37, with both filed under Auto-apply. Massive leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Application Honesty, while LazyApply leads 1, including Pricing & Cancellation Fairness. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: User Control & Transparency (LazyApply 33, Massive 55) and Application Honesty at 20% (LazyApply 32, Massive 50), the second being 26% of the weighted advantage Massive holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
LazyApply
LazyApply is a Chrome extension that automatically mass-applies to jobs on LinkedIn, Indeed, ZipRecruiter, Dice and Greenhouse by auto-filling application forms from a saved profile, and tracks the submitted applications in an analytics dashboard.
Vendor profile
Massive
Massive is an AI job-application copilot that matches roles, generates a tailored resume and cover letter for each job, and auto-fills and submits applications on a job seeker's behalf across job boards and company sites.
§ The record
LazyApply and Massive are both filed under Auto-apply tools. They also share 1 secondary category: Tracker.
| Record | LazyApply | Massive |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | High |
| Headquarters | IN | US |
| Founded | 2020 | 2022 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 26% of the movement so far
Application Honesty
LazyApply 32 · Massive 50
3.6 weighted points to Massive
15% weight · 50% of the movement so far
User Control & Transparency
LazyApply 33 · Massive 55
3.3 weighted points to Massive
12% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Effectiveness Evidence
LazyApply 35 · Massive 55
2.4 weighted points to Massive
15% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Employer & ATS Legitimacy
LazyApply 25 · Massive 40
2.3 weighted points to Massive
20% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Data & Credential Safety
LazyApply 50 · Massive 57
1.4 weighted points to Massive
8% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Support & Accountability
LazyApply 42 · Massive 50
0.6 weighted points to Massive
10% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Pricing & Cancellation Fairness
LazyApply 42 · Massive 40
0.2 weighted points to LazyApply
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -13.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -13 beside that -13.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is LazyApply minus Massive.
| Category | Weight | LazyApply | Massive | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Honesty | 20% | 32 | 50 | -18 | -3.6 |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 50 | 57 | -7 | -1.4 |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 33 | 55 | -22 | -3.3 |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 25 | 40 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 35 | 55 | -20 | -2.4 |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 42 | 40 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 42 | 50 | -8 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 50 (F) | -13 | -13.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | LazyApply | Massive | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Application Honesty | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 14 | 3 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 16 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
LazyApply has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; Massive has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LazyApply and Massive sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 35 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for LazyApply, across 4 distinct source domains, and 18 for Massive, across 5 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- js-v1.0
- LazyApply last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Massive last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next
Scored against