§ The result
Rezi leads LazyApply by 22 points.
Rezi finishes 22 points clear of LazyApply under rubric js-v1.0 — 59 against 37 — across the Resume AI and Auto-apply cohorts. Rezi leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Employer & ATS Legitimacy, while LazyApply leads 1, including Effectiveness Evidence. Employer & ATS Legitimacy is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (LazyApply 25, Rezi 68, 15% weight), but it accounts for only 29% of the weighted advantage Rezi holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
LazyApply
LazyApply is a Chrome extension that automatically mass-applies to jobs on LinkedIn, Indeed, ZipRecruiter, Dice and Greenhouse by auto-filling application forms from a saved profile, and tracks the submitted applications in an analytics dashboard.
Vendor profile
Rezi
Rezi is an AI resume builder that drafts and rewrites resume bullet points, summaries and cover letters, scores drafts against ATS formatting conventions with a 0-100 "Rezi Score", and adds a Chrome extension that autofills job applications on Workday, Greenhouse and Lever for the user to submit.
§ The record
LazyApply is filed under Auto-apply tools, Rezi under Resume & profile AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Tracker.
| Record | LazyApply | Rezi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | IN | KR |
| Founded | 2020 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 28% of the movement so far
Employer & ATS Legitimacy
LazyApply 25 · Rezi 68
6.5 weighted points to Rezi
15% weight · 53% of the movement so far
User Control & Transparency
LazyApply 33 · Rezi 70
5.5 weighted points to Rezi
20% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Application Honesty
LazyApply 32 · Rezi 55
4.6 weighted points to Rezi
8% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Support & Accountability
LazyApply 42 · Rezi 70
2.2 weighted points to Rezi
10% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Pricing & Cancellation Fairness
LazyApply 42 · Rezi 62
2.0 weighted points to Rezi
20% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Data & Credential Safety
LazyApply 50 · Rezi 58
1.6 weighted points to Rezi
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Effectiveness Evidence
LazyApply 35 · Rezi 32
0.4 weighted points to LazyApply
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -22.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 22.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -22 beside that -22.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is LazyApply minus Rezi.
| Category | Weight | LazyApply | Rezi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Honesty | 20% | 32 | 55 | -23 | -4.6 |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 50 | 58 | -8 | -1.6 |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 33 | 70 | -37 | -5.5 |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 25 | 68 | -43 | -6.5 |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 35 | 32 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 42 | 62 | -20 | -2.0 |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 42 | 70 | -28 | -2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 59 (F) | -22 | -22.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | LazyApply | Rezi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Application Honesty | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 4 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 14 | 3 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 27 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
LazyApply has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; Rezi has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LazyApply and Rezi sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 51 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for LazyApply, across 4 distinct source domains, and 34 for Rezi, across 6 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- js-v1.0
- LazyApply last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Rezi last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next
The full profiles
Scored against