HomeCompareLinkedIn Recruiter vs Oracle Recruiting

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

LinkedIn Recruiter vs Oracle Recruiting

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

LinkedIn Recruiter leads Oracle Recruiting on all 7 criteria.

LinkedIn Recruiter scores 57 and Oracle Recruiting 49 under rubric v1.0, an 8-point gap across the Sourcing and ATS-integrated cohorts. LinkedIn Recruiter leads every one of the 7 criteria, Oracle Recruiting none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Data Governance Disclosure, LinkedIn Recruiter 62 to Oracle Recruiting 60. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (LinkedIn Recruiter 50, Oracle Recruiting 30) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 44% of the weighted advantage LinkedIn Recruiter holds across the 7 criteria it leads.

§ The record

LinkedIn Recruiter is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Oracle Recruiting under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordLinkedIn RecruiterOracle Recruiting
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20021977

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 44% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    LinkedIn Recruiter 50 · Oracle Recruiting 30

    3.6 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  2. 20% weight · 61% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    LinkedIn Recruiter 67 · Oracle Recruiting 60

    1.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  3. 12% weight · 76% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    LinkedIn Recruiter 50 · Oracle Recruiting 40

    1.2 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  4. 12% weight · 85% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    LinkedIn Recruiter 66 · Oracle Recruiting 60

    0.7 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  5. 8% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    LinkedIn Recruiter 68 · Oracle Recruiting 62

    0.5 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  6. 15% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    LinkedIn Recruiter 38 · Oracle Recruiting 35

    0.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  7. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    LinkedIn Recruiter 62 · Oracle Recruiting 60

    0.3 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +8.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +8 beside that +8.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is LinkedIn Recruiter minus Oracle Recruiting.

CategoryWeightLinkedIn RecruiterOracle RecruitingΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6760+7+1.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%5030+20+3.6
FRIA Support15%3835+3+0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%6260+2+0.3
Human Oversight Design12%6660+6+0.7
Post-Market Monitoring12%5040+10+1.2
Customer Documentation8%6862+6+0.5
Total100%57 (F)49 (F)+8+8.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightLinkedIn RecruiterOracle Recruiting
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain12—
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%61Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%345Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain134Sources on the vendor's own domain

LinkedIn Recruiter has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Oracle Recruiting has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LinkedIn Recruiter sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 39 for LinkedIn Recruiter, across 6 distinct source domains, and 16 for Oracle Recruiting, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
LinkedIn Recruiter last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Oracle Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.