HomeCompareLinkedIn Recruiter vs Textkernel

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

LinkedIn Recruiter vs Textkernel

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

LinkedIn Recruiter leads Textkernel by 6 points.

LinkedIn Recruiter scores 57 and Textkernel 51 under rubric v1.0 — a 6-point gap inside the Sourcing cohort. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of LinkedIn Recruiter: LinkedIn Recruiter is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and Textkernel on Bias Audit Transparency. The advantage LinkedIn Recruiter holds is spread out: Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (LinkedIn Recruiter 67, Textkernel 55, 20% weight), yet it supplies only 36% of the weighted points LinkedIn Recruiter gains across the 6 criteria it leads.

§ The record

LinkedIn Recruiter and Textkernel are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordLinkedIn RecruiterTextkernel
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSNL
Founded20022001

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 31% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    LinkedIn Recruiter 67 · Textkernel 55

    2.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  2. 12% weight · 47% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    LinkedIn Recruiter 50 · Textkernel 40

    1.2 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  3. 15% weight · 61% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    LinkedIn Recruiter 62 · Textkernel 55

    1.1 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  4. 18% weight · 73% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    LinkedIn Recruiter 50 · Textkernel 55

    0.9 weighted points to Textkernel

  5. 15% weight · 84% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    LinkedIn Recruiter 38 · Textkernel 32

    0.9 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  6. 12% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    LinkedIn Recruiter 66 · Textkernel 60

    0.7 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    LinkedIn Recruiter 68 · Textkernel 62

    0.5 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +5.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +6 beside that +5.8.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is LinkedIn Recruiter minus Textkernel.

CategoryWeightLinkedIn RecruiterTextkernelΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6755+12+2.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%5055-5-0.9
FRIA Support15%3832+6+0.9
Data Governance Disclosure15%6255+7+1.1
Human Oversight Design12%6660+6+0.7
Post-Market Monitoring12%5040+10+1.2
Customer Documentation8%6862+6+0.5
Total100%57 (F)51 (F)+6+5.8

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightLinkedIn RecruiterTextkernel
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11—
Data Governance Disclosure15%50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%61Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%345Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain135Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

LinkedIn Recruiter has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Textkernel has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LinkedIn Recruiter sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 57 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 39 for LinkedIn Recruiter, across 6 distinct source domains, and 18 for Textkernel, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
LinkedIn Recruiter last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Textkernel last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.