HomeCompareLinkedIn Recruiter vs UKG

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

LinkedIn Recruiter vs UKG

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

LinkedIn Recruiter leads UKG on all 7 criteria.

LinkedIn Recruiter sits 13 points above UKG under rubric v1.0 — 57 against 44 — with LinkedIn Recruiter filed under Sourcing and UKG under ATS-integrated. LinkedIn Recruiter takes all 7 criteria and UKG none of them; the nearest contest is FRIA Support, LinkedIn Recruiter 38 to UKG 35. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap (LinkedIn Recruiter 50, UKG 30) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (LinkedIn Recruiter 67, UKG 48), 29% of the weighted advantage LinkedIn Recruiter builds across the 7 criteria it leads.

§ The record

LinkedIn Recruiter is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, UKG under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordLinkedIn RecruiterUKG
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20022020

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 29% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    LinkedIn Recruiter 67 · UKG 48

    3.8 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  2. 18% weight · 57% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    LinkedIn Recruiter 50 · UKG 30

    3.6 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  3. 12% weight · 70% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    LinkedIn Recruiter 66 · UKG 52

    1.7 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  4. 12% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    LinkedIn Recruiter 50 · UKG 38

    1.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  5. 8% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    LinkedIn Recruiter 68 · UKG 55

    1.0 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  6. 15% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    LinkedIn Recruiter 62 · UKG 56

    0.9 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  7. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    LinkedIn Recruiter 38 · UKG 35

    0.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +12.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +13 beside that +12.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is LinkedIn Recruiter minus UKG.

CategoryWeightLinkedIn RecruiterUKGΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6748+19+3.8
Bias Audit Transparency18%5030+20+3.6
FRIA Support15%3835+3+0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%6256+6+0.9
Human Oversight Design12%6652+14+1.7
Post-Market Monitoring12%5038+12+1.4
Customer Documentation8%6855+13+1.0
Total100%57 (F)44 (F)+13+12.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightLinkedIn RecruiterUKG
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain02—
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain02—
Post-Market Monitoring12%61Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%345Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain68Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

LinkedIn Recruiter has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; UKG has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LinkedIn Recruiter sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 53 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 39 for LinkedIn Recruiter, across 6 distinct source domains, and 14 for UKG, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
LinkedIn Recruiter last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
UKG last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.