§ The result
Rezi leads LockedIn AI on all 7 criteria.
Rubric js-v1.0 puts 32 points between Rezi (Resume AI) and LockedIn AI (Live interview): 59 for Rezi, 27 for LockedIn AI. Rezi leads every one of the 7 criteria and 6 of them by 20 raw points or more, Employer & ATS Legitimacy among them; LockedIn AI leads none. Employer & ATS Legitimacy is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (LockedIn AI 10, Rezi 68, 15% weight), but it accounts for only 27% of the weighted advantage Rezi holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
LockedIn AI
LockedIn AI is a real-time interview copilot that listens to a job seeker's live interview, coding round or online assessment and displays AI-generated answers, code and coaching on their screen, alongside free resume, cover-letter and job-tracking tools.
Vendor profile
Rezi
Rezi is an AI resume builder that drafts and rewrites resume bullet points, summaries and cover letters, scores drafts against ATS formatting conventions with a 0-100 "Rezi Score", and adds a Chrome extension that autofills job applications on Workday, Greenhouse and Lever for the user to submit.
§ The record
LockedIn AI is filed under Live interview assistance, Rezi under Resume & profile AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Tracker.
| Record | LockedIn AI | Rezi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | KR |
| Founded | 2024 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 27% of the movement so far
Employer & ATS Legitimacy
LockedIn AI 10 · Rezi 68
8.7 weighted points to Rezi
20% weight · 55% of the movement so far
Application Honesty
LockedIn AI 12 · Rezi 55
8.6 weighted points to Rezi
15% weight · 69% of the movement so far
User Control & Transparency
LockedIn AI 40 · Rezi 70
4.5 weighted points to Rezi
10% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Pricing & Cancellation Fairness
LockedIn AI 33 · Rezi 62
2.9 weighted points to Rezi
12% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Effectiveness Evidence
LockedIn AI 10 · Rezi 32
2.6 weighted points to Rezi
8% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Support & Accountability
LockedIn AI 40 · Rezi 70
2.4 weighted points to Rezi
20% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data & Credential Safety
LockedIn AI 48 · Rezi 58
2.0 weighted points to Rezi
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -31.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 31.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -32 beside that -31.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is LockedIn AI minus Rezi.
| Category | Weight | LockedIn AI | Rezi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Honesty | 20% | 12 | 55 | -43 | -8.6 |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 48 | 58 | -10 | -2.0 |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 40 | 70 | -30 | -4.5 |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 10 | 68 | -58 | -8.7 |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 10 | 32 | -22 | -2.6 |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 33 | 62 | -29 | -2.9 |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 40 | 70 | -30 | -2.4 |
| Total | 100% | 27 (F) | 59 (F) | -32 | -31.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | LockedIn AI | Rezi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Application Honesty | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 27 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
LockedIn AI has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Rezi has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LockedIn AI and Rezi sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 64 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for LockedIn AI, across 3 distinct source domains, and 34 for Rezi, across 6 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- js-v1.0
- LockedIn AI last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Rezi last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next
The full profiles
Scored against